Legal Opinion

McKay v. Russell

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1891No. 292PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court King Comity.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dunbar, J.

Respondent contracted with appellants to buy a certain number of town lots in the town of Ballard, *379in King county, Washington, making a payment of $860; the balance, $140, was to have been paid in a few days. It seems that the contract was made and the money paid by respondent without first looking at the lots, he alleging that he relied exclusively upon the integrity of the appellants, and bought entirely upon the strength of the representations made by them. It is claimed and alleged by the respondent that, when he came to see the lots…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Castle v. BullardSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
  2. Commonwealth v. JacksonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
  3. Jordan v. OsgoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  4. Butler v. WatkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  5. Haskins v. WarrenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Colonial Refrigerated Transportation, Inc. v. George P. Mitchell, George P. Mitchell v. Colonial Refrigerated Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  2. Estate Clara R. Starr v. WilsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  3. Yakima Valley Bank v. McAllisterWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Stowe v. WootenTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  5. Fulwider v. WoodsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API