Legal Opinion

Klepsky v. Dick Enterprises, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 9, 2003No. 01-3486PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELL, District Judge.

This action involves an intentional tort claim brought by an employee against his employer. Defendant Dick Enterprises, Inc. appeals the district court’s denial of its motion for judgment as a matter of law or, in the alternative, for a new trial. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the judgment entered in the district court.

I

Plaintiff Thomas M. Klepsky suffered an on-the-job injury while he was employed as a carpenter by defendant Dick Enterprises. Klepsky filed suit against his employer in Ohio state court alleging that Dick Enterprises was hable for intentionally…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. Lawson Milk Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Van Fossen v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Fyffe v. Jeno's, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. K & T Enterprises, Inc., D/B/A Dairy Queen of Blissfield, and Tahani Khoury v. Zurich Insurance Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  5. Cantrell v. GAF Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Berkel & Co. v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  2. Mitchell v. Diamond Plastics CorpDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2021
  3. Range v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API