Legal Opinion

Duszynski v. B & T Riding Academy, Inc.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1966PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.

The issue involved is whether the release signed by the plaintiff is void by law as being against public policy.

Plaintiffs in their statement of facts cite only that portion of the release which provides:

“. . . to release its agents and employees, from all claims for loss, damage or injury, except such as are caused by its or their gross negligence.”

The release contains the following language not cited by plaintiffs:

“The undersigned recognizes that the horse is a creature capable of and given to independent action and assumes the entire risk and responsibility for damage or injury suffered or…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Moss v. FortuneTennessee Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Broderson v. Rainier National Park Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Troop a Riding Academy v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Kitchin v. Gary Steel Products Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1954

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Merten v. NathanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Merten v. NathanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API