Legal Opinion
Goglia v. Sardino
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 30, 1983PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
John W. Grow, J.
The issue presented before this court is whether the respondent City of Syracuse may suspend a police officer’s salary without an evidentiary hearing for failure to report for regular duty after he has been certified as physically able to work pursuant to section 207-c of the General Municipal Law.
Petitioner Thomas Goglia claims that he is disabled from performing his duties as a police officer for the City of Syracuse due to a series of back injuries he sustained in 1972, 1974, and 1978. During a period of disability from March 1, 1980, to January 13,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- De Milio v. BorghardNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Johnson v. Director, Downstate Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Klonowski v. Department of FireNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- King v. City of NewburghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Gargiul v. Board of Education of the Liverpool Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Uniform Firefighters of Cohoes v. City of CohoesNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- Heck v. KeaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Goglia v. SardinoNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Goglia v. SardinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984