Legal Opinion

Goglia v. Sardino

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 25, 1985PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in its memorandum decision (see, 101 AD2d 1013) and in the decision of Justice John W. Grow at Special Term (119 Misc 2d 907; see also, Cleveland Bd. of Educ. v Loudermill, 470 US_, 105 S Ct 1487).

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye and Alexander concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Goglia v. SardinoNew York Supreme Court · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Uniform Firefighters of Cohoes v. City of CohoesNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Heck v. KeaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. DeMasi v. BeneficoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006