Introducing Exa PlacesLearn more
Legal Opinion

Medina Madrid

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided March 13, 2026No. ID 4173PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Cite as

29 I&N Dec. 514

(BIA 2026) Interim Decision #4173 Matter of Terisita MEDINA MADRID, Respondent Decided March 13, 2026 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals Where the respondent’s removal proceedings have been administratively closed for over 13 years, continued administrative closure is not warranted based on the respondent’s intention to apply for a provisional unlawful presence waiver with United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. FOR THE RESPONDENT: Pro se FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY: Crystal Morales,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. W-Y-UBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2017
  2. MEDINABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1988
  3. Enrique Antonio GALO-GARCIA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  4. B-N-KBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2025
  5. Cahuec TzalamBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. T-A-GBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API