Eriksen v. Whitescarver
Supreme Court of Colorado
Error to Denver District Court. — Hon. Greeley W. Whiteord, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gabbert
The right of way for an irrigation ditch is an easement, and constitutes an incumbrance upon land subject to such easement. Plaintiff covenanted to convey her lots free and clear of such an incumbrance. The mere fact that defendant may have known of the existence of the ditch, at the time she signed the contract did not relieve the plaintiff from complying with her covenant respecting the character of the title' she agreed to convey. To produce such result there must, in addition to notice, have been at least something in the transaction to show that the parties intended the incumbrance…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kellogg v. MalinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
- Quick v. TaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Burk v. HillIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Barlow v. DelaneyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1889
- Flynn v. White Breast Coal & Mining Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1887
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Navajo Development Co. v. SandersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- O'Hara Group Denver, Ltd. v. Marcor Housing Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1979
- LOVELAND ESSENTIAL GROUP, LLC. v. Grommon Farms, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2010
- White v. EvansSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
- Reinhardt v. MeyerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.