Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 26, 1981No. Appeal, No. 1494 C.D. 1979PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Jurge Mencer,

In this workmen’s compensation appeal, the sole issue is whether the referee’s decision denying bene*119fits is deficient as a matter of law because the referee failed to rule on the admissibility of hospital records offered by the defendant. We hold that it is not and affirm.

Wilbert Thomas (claimant) filed a petition claiming that he was totally disabled due to coal worker’s pneumoconiosis. At the hearing, both claimant and Consolidation Coal Company (employer) introduced conflicting testimony from doctors. In addition, employer sought to introduce some hospital records of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. American Refrigerator Equipment Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Cody v. S.K.F. Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Nesbit v. Vandervort & CurrySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Scannella v. Salerno Importing Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. QuickCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gamble v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Aversa v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Karsaba v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API