Thomas v. Commonwealth
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Jurge Mencer,
In this workmen’s compensation appeal, the sole issue is whether the referee’s decision denying bene*119fits is deficient as a matter of law because the referee failed to rule on the admissibility of hospital records offered by the defendant. We hold that it is not and affirm.
Wilbert Thomas (claimant) filed a petition claiming that he was totally disabled due to coal worker’s pneumoconiosis. At the hearing, both claimant and Consolidation Coal Company (employer) introduced conflicting testimony from doctors. In addition, employer sought to introduce some hospital records of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- American Refrigerator Equipment Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Cody v. S.K.F. Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Nesbit v. Vandervort & CurrySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Scannella v. Salerno Importing Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. QuickCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gamble v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Aversa v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Karsaba v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983