Legal Opinion
State v. Okegbenro
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 30, 1987No. C1-86-1591PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
This appeal is from a judgment of conviction of two counts of first degree criminal sexual conduct. Appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, as well as evi-dentiary rulings. Appellant claims, and the State agrees, that one of the convictions and accompanying sentence must be vacated under Minn.Stat. § 609.04 (1986). We affirm in part, and vacate one of the convictions and its sentence.
FACTS
Appellant Taofik Okegbenro picked up M.M. in downtown St. Paul sometime after 1:00 a.m. on January 25, 1986. M.M. testified she asked for a ride to her boyfriend’s house…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. HensleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- State v. UlvinenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. DanielsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. VanceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- State v. RobertsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Brian F. Leonard v. R.E. Fritz, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2000