Legal Opinion

Salt Lake City v. Williams

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided November 10, 2005No. 20040942-CAPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McHUGH, Judge:

¶1 Rocky Chad Williams appeals his convictions for making threats against life or property and violation of a protective order, see Utah Code Ann. §§ 76-5-107 to -108 (20083), on the grounds that the trial court improperly admitted hearsay testimony in violation of Williams's Sixth Amendment right to confrontation. This is an issue of first impression for this court under the United States Supreme Court's recent decision in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S.Ct. 1354, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004). For the reasons set forth herein, we affirm.

BACKGROUND

2 On July 17, 2008,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. White v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. State v. PenaUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. DunnUtah Supreme Court · 1993

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. MizenkoMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Salt Lake City v. GeorgeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2008
  3. State v. MelanconCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
  4. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
  5. Belnap v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API