Legal Opinion

Salt Lake City v. George

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided July 3, 2008No. 20060591-CAPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THORNE, Associate Presiding Judge:

T1 Defendant Frederick Thomas George petitioned for interlocutory appeal from a pretrial order denying his motion in limine, which this court granted. Defendant asserts that Utah Code section 41-6a-515, which allows admission of Certificates of Calibration, see Utah Code Ann. § 41-6a-515 (2005), and the district court's subsequent ruling allowing Salt Lake City (the City) to admit those documents into evidence in lieu of live testimony violates his constitutional right to confrontation. See U.S. Const. amend. VI. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

T2 On March 31,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Iowa v. TovarSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. State v. GreenUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Bohsancurt v. EisenbergCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. PealerNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Commonwealth v. ZeiningerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
  3. State v. GriffinUtah Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Ramirez v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. State v. MarchetCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API