Legal Opinion · Dissent

South Carolina Department of Motor Vehicles v. Brown

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 8, 2014No. Appellate Case No. 2011-194026; No. 27346Published

1DissentJustice Beatty

I dissent as I believe Petitioner properly preserved a valid challenge to the sufficiency of the Department’s case. Furthermore, I believe our standard of review mandates a reversal as there is evidence to support the Hearing Officer’s finding that the Department failed to present a prima facie case to suspend Petitioner’s license under section 56-5-2951. Accordingly, I would reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals and reinstate the Hearing Officer’s order rescinding Petitioner’s license suspension.

I. Discussion

A. Error Preservation

As an initial matter, I disagree with the majority’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. I'On, L.L.C. v. Town of Mt. PleasantSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. Wilder Corp. v. WilkeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  3. State v. ParkerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  4. S.C. Department of Motor Vehicles v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  5. State v. HuntleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API