Legal Opinion

Perkins v. Maiden

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 21, 1940No. Civ. 11427PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

As administratrix of the estate of F. W. Perkins, deceased, the plaintiff sued the defendant to recover a judgment for $5,000. The defendant answered and the action was tried by the trial court sitting without a jury. When the plaintiff had rested her ease, on the motion of the defendant the trial court ordered a nonsuit. The plaintiff made a motion for a new trial, the motion was denied, and the plaintiff has appealed.

The order of nonsuit was entered on January 15, 1940, the day it was announced. On January 17, 1940, the defendant prepared a formal judgment of nonsuit, had it signed by the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gregg v. Western Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Scrimsher v. Reliance Rock Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Savings Union Bank & Trust Co. v. CrowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Stockwell v. Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior UniversityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  2. City of Santa Cruz v. MacGregorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Perkins v. MaidenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Hixson v. International Harvester Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Lich v. CarlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API