Legal Opinion
Palmer v. City of Chicago
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided April 27, 1983No. 82 C 2349PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, District Judge.
Two sets of plaintiffs have filed this class action seeking, among other relief, a preliminary injunction. This. Court has conducted an evidentiary hearing on the motion for preliminary injunctive relief. In accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. (“Rule”) 52(a) this memorandum opinion and order reflects this Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. To the extent (if any) that matters stated in the “Conclusions of Law” section of this opinion contain factual statements, those statements shall be considered findings of fact as well. For the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Wayne Chemical, Inc., Robert C. Tribolet and Thomas C. Tribolet v. Columbus Agency Service CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Syntex Ophthalmics, Inc. And Arapahoe Chemicals, Inc. v. George F. Tsuetaki, Fused Kontacts of Chicago, Inc. And Nick N. NovickyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. HobleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
- Reuben Palmer v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Reuben Palmer, Subclass a and Edward Negron, Subclass B v. City of Chicago, Richard Brzeczek, Commander Milton Deas, and Richard M. DaleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Rivera v. GuevaraDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
- Palmer v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.