Legal Opinion

LeBlanc v. Kruger

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1889PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Wayne. (Reilly, J.) Trespass for non-removal of encroachment on highway. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

This suit, the names of the parties to which are becoming familiar in this Court, was begun by plaintiff, as highway commissioner, to- remove an alleged highway encroachment in Ecorse.2 The road in question is not one legally set out, but, so far as it exists, is a highway by user only, and is therefore confined to the width actually used by *562the public, and cannot be enlarged without regular proceedings and assessment of damages.

The statute in regard to such proceedings directs the commissioner to make a written order requiring the occupant to remove the encroachment within thirty days,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kruger v. Le BlancMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Krueger v. Le BlancMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Township of Lebanon v. BurchMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API