Legal Opinion

Kruger v. Le Blanc

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1888PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Hosmer, J.) Trespass. Plaintiff brings error. The facta are stated in the opinion, and in the former report of the case in 62 Mich. 70.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

The plaintiff brought an action of trespass, on the case against the defendants, claiming damages for the unlawful and malicious destruction of a fence along one side of her land, and some fruit and shade trees.

The defendants pleaded the general issue, and justified, claiming-that defendant Le Blanc was highway commissioner, and acted in his official capacity, by virtue of proceedings taken to remove obstructions from the highway known as the “ St. Cosme Line Road,” and that the other defendants were acting under his authority.

The case was tried in the circuit court without a jury, and *78judgmen…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bumpus v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1856

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Adams v. Iron Cliffs Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Eager v. State Highway CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  3. City of Kentwood v. Sommerdyke EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Rigoni v. Michigan Power Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Smith v. State Highway CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1924

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API