Legal Opinion
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided January 11, 1991No. Nos. 89-1367, 89-1417PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SENTELLE.
SENTELLE, Circuit Judge:
This case is the consolidation of two challenges to orders of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC” or “the Commission”) directing Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation (“Transco”) to refund fuel retainage costs it charged to local gas distribution companies (“LDCs”) for the period of April 1, 1984 to April 1, 1987. Transco petitions for review of these orders, arguing that the fuel retention rates for that time period were previously resolved in a settlement agreement between the parties and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Papago Tribal Utility Authority v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Arizona Public Service Company and Arizona Power Authority, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- West 14th Street Commercial Corp. v. 5 West 14th Owners Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Phillips Petroleum Company v. Federal Power Commission, Phillips Petroleum Company v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
- Transcanada Pipelines Limited v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, No. 87-1229Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.