Hensley v. North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Dissent
STEELMAN,
Judge dissenting.
I must respectfully dissent from the majority’s decision to reverse the trial court’s order granting respondent’s motion for summary judgment. The fundamental purpose of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 113A-57(1) is to control the effects of sedimentation resulting from land-disturbing activities. Based upon a proper application of this principal, respondent issued a variance to Mountain Air, and the trial court properly affirmed respondent.
I. Additional Factual and Procedural Background
Before undertaking this project, Mountain Air obtained a Clean. Water Act § 401 Water Quality…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Quick v. QuickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Godfrey v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment of Union CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Atlantic Coast Mechanical, Inc. v. Arcadis, Geraghty & Miller of North Carolina, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- County of Durham v. North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
- Rainey v. North Carolina Department of Public InstructionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.