Legal Opinion

Rainey v. North Carolina Department of Public Instruction

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 9, 2007No. 143PA07PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

In reversing the trial court’s judgment and order that petitionerappellee, Madeline Davis Tucker, did not qualify for a twelve percent salary increase under North Carolina’s National Board for Professional Teaching Standards program, the Court of Appeals determined, inter alia, that the trial court erred in applying the de novo standard of review mandated by N.C.G.S. § 150B-51(c). We reverse and remand to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration.

N.C.G.S. § 150B-51(c), added to the North Carolina Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”) by our legislature in 2000, mandates that in cases in which…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. North Carolina Savings & Loan League v. North Carolina Credit Union CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Rainey v. North Carolina Department of Public InstructionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Cashwell v. Department of State TreasurerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  2. Granger v. UNIVERSITY OF NC AT CHAPEL HILLCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  3. Hensley v. North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
  4. Frampton v. Univ. of N.C. At Chapel HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
  5. Hensley v. North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API