Carl E. Cook v. Jack A. Hanberry, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Atlanta, Georgia
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
A federal prisoner currently serving sentences for bank robbery and assaulting a fellow inmate with a deadly weapon, Cook filed a pro se petition, styled under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, seeking release or return from the Atlanta Prison where he was then incarcerated to a facility on the West Coast where he had previously been confined.
The general rule in federal cases requires that an actual controversy exist at all stages of appellate review, “and not simply at the date the action is initiated.” Roe v. Wade, 1972, 410 U.S. 113, 125, 93 S.Ct. 705, 712, 35 L.Ed.2d 147. Insofar as Cook’s petitions…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Marie Pierre v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- A. D. Granville v. W. B. HuntCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Tora C. Brennan v. Midwestern United Life Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
- Konigsberg v. CicconeDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Shaker Aamer v. Barack ObamaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Addones Spencer v. Anthony HaynesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- Carlos Poree v. Kandy CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- Lutz v. HemingwayDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2007
- Bin-Rilla v. IsraelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.