Legal Opinion

In re Clearly Canadian Securities Litigation

District Court, N.D. California

Decided February 7, 1995No. Master File No. C-93-1037-VRW; MDL No. 993Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER.

WALKER, District Judge.

Plaintiffs have filed a seventy-four page complaint with one-hundred-nineteen paragraphs, some with multiple subparts, purporting to allege a fraud-on-the-market securities class action against Clearly Canadian, Inc., and its officers and directors. Through the court’s authority under FRCP 12(f), this order strikes the redundant and immaterial from these recitals to focus on any claims the facts at bar may present.

Plaintiffs claim that between August 3, 1992, and July 17, 1993, defendants artificially inflated the price of Clearly Canadian stock through a series…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Salahuddin v. CuomoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  5. Blackie v. BarrackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API