Legal Opinion

State v. Pharm

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided June 13, 2000No. 98-1542PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurley, J.

¶ 1. Frederick L. Pharm appeals from the judgment finding him to be a sexually violent person under Wis. Stat. § 980.01(7), 1 and an order committing him to a secure mental health facility. Pharm also appeals from an order denying his postcommitment motion. Pharm argues that: (1) the chapter 980 petition should be dismissed because there is no indication in the record that the Department of Corrections (DOC), as the agency with the authority to release Pharm from custody, notified the Department of Justice (DOJ) under Wis. Stat. § 980.015 that Pharm met the criteria for commitment, nor is…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. MacHnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Wirth v. EhlyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. PitschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State v. BentleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. ByersWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. MacArthurWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State ex rel. Pharm v. BartowWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  4. In Re Commitment of KaminskiCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2009
  5. State Ex Rel. Myers v. SwensonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API