Ferrell v. EZPawn Oklahoma Inc
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA TYLER GORDON FERRELL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. CIV-18-607-SLP ) EZPAWN OKLAHOMA, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) O R D E R Before the Court are two motions. First, after Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint1 [Doc. No. 12] while proceeding pro se, Defendant filed its Second Partial Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 14]. Plaintiff did not file a response to Defendant’s motion, and the Court may not summarily deem Defendant’s motion confessed under Local Civil Rule 7.1(g). See Issa v. Comp USA,
354 F.3d 1174, 1177-78
(10th Cir.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Minter v. Prime Equipment Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Gff Corporation, an Oklahoma Corporation v. Associated Wholesale Grocers, Inc., a Missouri CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.