Legal Opinion

Ferrell v. EZPawn Oklahoma Inc

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided July 16, 2019No. 5:18-cv-00607Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA TYLER GORDON FERRELL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. CIV-18-607-SLP ) EZPAWN OKLAHOMA, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) O R D E R Before the Court are two motions. First, after Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint1 [Doc. No. 12] while proceeding pro se, Defendant filed its Second Partial Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 14]. Plaintiff did not file a response to Defendant’s motion, and the Court may not summarily deem Defendant’s motion confessed under Local Civil Rule 7.1(g). See Issa v. Comp USA,

354 F.3d 1174, 1177-78

(10th Cir.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Minter v. Prime Equipment Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  5. Gff Corporation, an Oklahoma Corporation v. Associated Wholesale Grocers, Inc., a Missouri CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API