Legal Opinion
Rodriguez v. Vuono
District Court, D. Puerto Rico
Decided February 25, 1991No. Civ. 91-1167(JAF)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
FUSTE, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Jorge E. Rodriguez, a medical doctor, seeks to rescind an enlistment contract with the United States Army. Dr. Rodriguez was called to active duty in May of 1990, at which time he was ordered to 'report to Ft. Sam Houston, Texas, on July 15, 1990. 1 As of February 13, 1991, he had failed to report to any military facility for duty in response to the order. Dr. Rodriguez claims that the enlistment contract, which he admittedly signed, is voidable by him because he was fraudulently induced into believing that he could never be called to active…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Clearfield Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Irby v. United States, Department of the ArmyDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2003
- Romero v. BradyDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1991
- Tartt v. Secretary of ArmyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993