Legal Opinion · Concurrence

AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. v. Padgett (In Re Padgett)

Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 20, 2009No. BAP No. KS-08-069. Bankr.No. 07-41284Published

1Concurrence

STARZYNSKI, Bankruptcy Judge,

concurring.

I concur in the Court’s decision to reverse the bankruptcy court’s decision, but I respectfully reach that conclusion on a different basis than that of the majority.

The statute at issue, frequently referred to as the “hanging paragraph” and found at or after § 1325(a)(9)1, reads in relevant part as follows:

*382“For purposes of paragraph (5) [§ 1325(a)(5) ], section 506 shall not apply to a claim described in that paragraph if the creditor has a purchase money security interest securing the debt that is the subject of the claim, the debt was incurred within…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Nobelman v. American Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API