Denholm & McKay Co. v. Commissioner of Int. Rev.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MAGRUDER, Circuit Judge.
For present purposes, it stands conceded that Denholm & McKay Company, the taxpayer-petitioner herein, made an overpayment of income tax for its fiscal year ending January 31, 1935, in the sum of $821.37. In its attempt to obtain a refund, the taxpayer has run into a legal obstacle of a somewhat unusual nature, and one not covered by any decided case, so far as we can discover.
The case, in brief, is this: After hearing upon a petition for redetermination of a deficiency, the Board duly entered its decision to the effect that there was no deficiency and, in addition,…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Wayne United Gas Co. v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Pfister v. Northern Illinois Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Aspen Mining & Smelting Co. v. BillingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Brockett v. BrockettSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
- Kingman v. Western Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Brown v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Josephine C. Toscano AKA Josephine C. Zelasko v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- Bessie Lasky and Jesse L. Lasky v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Stewart v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2006
- William G. Nordvik Claire N. Nordvik v. Commissioner Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.