Legal Opinion

United States v. Francis

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 24, 1933No. 7010PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

Carl R. Francis brought this action to recover upon a war risk insurance policy which lapsed May 3, 1919, upon the ground that before the policy lapsed he had become permanently and totally disabled. He was wounded in battle on May 10,1918, by a piece of shrapnel which entered the front of his body and was removed from Ms back on August 3 0, 1918. During the interim he was in various military hospitals and subjected to numerous operations; pus conditions having developed in the wound. After Ms discharge he worked for some time before being given vocational training.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Spring Co. v. EdgarSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Raub v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1902

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Everhart v. State Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1946
  2. Putman v. PolleiMontana Supreme Court · 1969
  3. United States v. AlgerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
  4. Nolan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
  5. United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API