Legal Opinion

Fraternal Order of Transit Police v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 23, 2003Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge FRIEDMAN.

The Fraternal Order of Transit Police (FOTP) petitions this court for review of the May 20, 2003, order of the Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board (PLRB), which dismissed the FOTP’s exceptions to a PLRB decision declining to direct a hearing on the FOTP’s Petition for Representation (Petition). We affirm.

In its Petition, the FOTP sought to represent a unit of transit police officers employed by the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) for purposes of collective bargaining under Act 111, the Act of June 24,1968, P.L. 237, 43 P.S. §§ 217.1-217.10.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Feingold v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Raymond Crilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority and United Transportation Union, Local 1594Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  3. Philadelphia Housing Authority v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Ellwood City Police Wage & Policy Unit v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API