Legal Opinion

Eriksen v. Blue Cross of Idaho Health Services, Inc.

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided August 3, 1989No. 17581PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BURNETT, Judge.

We are asked to review a magistrate’s award of attorney fees to the prevailing parties in a contract dispute. The dispositive issues are whether the award is authorized by I.C. § 12-120(3) and, if so, whether the amount awarded is reasonable. The district court has upheld the award. Today we do the same.

The pertinent facts are undisputed. In 1984, Blue Cross of Idaho Health Services, Inc., entered a contract with' Albert and Patricia Eriksen, providing coverage of medical and hospital expenses. Mrs. Erik-sen subsequently underwent surgery. Blue Cross paid some of her bills but…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Griggs v. NashIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Hartley v. Miller-StephanIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Camp v. JiminezIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Penrose v. Commercial Travelers Insurance Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Spidell v. JenkinsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bott v. Idaho State Building AuthorityIdaho Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API