Di Giorgio Fruit Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWilbur K. Miller, Circuit Judge
I dissent from that portion of the majority opinion which upholds the Labor Board’s decision in favor of the Farm Union. My reasons are these:
By the terms of the Act, it is an unfair practice for a labor organization or its agents to engage in secondary boycotts. The Farm Union, acting as agent for the National Farm Labor Union, which is a labor organization within the meaning of the statute, engaged in such boycotts. The Farm Union was therefore guilty of the unfair labor practices charged against it by the General Counsel of the Labor Board.
To test the foregoing statements, let us first see…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Denver Building & Construction Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- National Labor Relations Board v. International Rice Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Park Transfer Co. v. Lumbermens Mut. Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
- Hooper-Holmes Bureau, Inc. v. BunnCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1947
- National Battery Co. v. LevyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.