Legal Opinion

United States v. Foster

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided July 10, 1992No. NMCM 91 2346PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MOLLISON, Judge.

The appellant was tried by special court-martial. Consistent with his pleas of guilty, he was found guilty of two counts of unauthorized absence in violation of Article 86, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 886. The appellant elected to be sentenced by a military judge sitting alone.1 During the pre-sentencing procedure, the appellant made an unsworn statement. Rule for Courts-Martial (R.C.M.) 1001(c)(2), Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1984. The first portion of the unsworn statement was made by the appellant’s trial defense counsel. In it, trial…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. DuBayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
  3. United States v. ScottUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  4. United States v. AllenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984
  5. United States v. PolkUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. FolkU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API