Legal Opinion

Hynix Semiconductor, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided April 1, 2004No. SLIP OP. 04-30; Court 01-00988PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARMAN, Judge.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1581(c) (2000), this Court has jurisdiction to review the United States Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce”) Final Results of Redetermi-nation Pursuant to Court Remand (Dec. 17, 2003) (“Remand Results II”), filed with the Court in response to its opinion and order in Hynix Semiconductor, Inc. v. United States, 295 F.Supp.2d 1365 (CIT 2003) (“Hynix II”). This Court will sustain Remand Results II unless it is “unsupported by substantial evidence on the record, or otherwise not in accordance with law.” 19 U.S.C. § 1516a(b)(l)(B)(i).

Backgkound

In Hynix…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Micron Technology, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1995
  2. Hynix Semiconductor, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003
  3. Hynix Semiconductor, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hynix Semiconductor, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  2. Hyundai Electronics Industries Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
  3. Hynix Semiconductor, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
  4. Hynix Semiconductor, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  5. Hyundai Elecs. Indus. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API