Legal Opinion

Noble v. Franchise Tax Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 11, 2004No. B167881Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs and appellants Homer E. Noble (Homer) 1 and Stephanie F. Noble (Stephanie), his spouse, filed an action against defendant and respondent Franchise Tax Board (FTB) seeking a declaration that appellants were not residents of California for tax purposes as of and after March 1, 1994, and particularly March 7 and March 25, 1994. Those were dates on which certain securities were sold resulting in capital gains. Thus, appellants claimed they should not be taxed on these transactions as if they had been residents of California. The FTB counters that appellants…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Peracchi v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. DeMiglio v. MashoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. Chambers v. HathawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API