Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Cohen

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 3, 1923No. Appeal, No. 55PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Fbazeb,

Plaintiffs’ action is based on two drafts drawn by defendants’ agent, representing part payment of the purchase price of three cars of tomatoes bought by defendants from plaintiffs. Defendants alleged the tomatoes on arrival at destination were found to be of inferior grade, defective, and not the quality represented by plaintiffs and refused payment of the drafts. At the trial defendants offered to prove inspection immediately upon arrival of the cars at their destination and that the contents were found to be defective and of inferior grade. The trial judge…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Samuel v. Delaware River Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  2. Selser v. Roberts & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rothermel v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Curry v. RigglesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Field v. DescalziSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  4. McKeage MacHinery Co. v. Osborne & Sexton MacHinery Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API