Legal Opinion
Roederer v. Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided June 9, 2020No. 3:18-cv-00448Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION TODD ROEDERER Plaintiff v. Civil Action No. 3:18-cv-00448-RGJ LOUISVILLE/JEFFERSON COUNTY Defendant METRO GOVERNMENT * * * * * MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Defendant Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government (“Metro Government”) moves for summary judgment. [DE 20]. Plaintiff Todd Roederer (“Roederer”) responded [DE 23], and Metro Government replied, [DE 24]. For the reasons below, Metro Government’s Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND The basic facts are not in…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Ovall Dale Kendall v. The Hoover CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.