Scott v. State

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

DICE, Judge.

Appellant re-urges his contentions that the trial court erred in overruling his motion for new trial based upon jury misconduct and that reversible error was committed by state’s counsel in his argument to the jury.

*386The claim of error in the court’s overruling the motion for new trial is not properly before us for review. There are no formal bills of exception. Appellant’s motion for new trial on the ground of jury misconduct and the court’s order thereon overruling the same is insufficient to constitute an informal bill of exception under Article 760e,…