Legal Opinion

GILREATH v. SMITH Et Al.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 17, 2017No. A16A1747PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Branch, Judge.

While pet sitting for Bruce and Jodi Smith, Josephine Gilreath was attacked and injured by the Smiths’ rooster, which caused a serious infection with long-term consequences. Gilreath filed suit, but the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the Smiths on the ground that Gilreath assumed the risk. Gilreath appeals.

A party is entitled to summary judgment if there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c). On appeal from the grant of summary judgment, we construe the evidence most favorably…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Home Builders Ass'n of Savannah, Inc. v. Chatham CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
  2. The Landings Ass'n v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012
  3. Sutton v. SuttonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  4. Bodymasters Sports Industries, Inc. v. WimberleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  5. Ansley v. Raczka-LongSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Elvis Downes v. Oglethorpe University, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
  2. SAULSBURY Et Al. v. WILSON.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
  3. Brian William Thompkins v. Enrique Gonzalez-NunezCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2020
  4. H AND L FARMS LLC v. SILICON RANCH CORPORATIONDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API