Legal Opinion

Josefa Ernestina Chaira v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 5, 1995No. 94-70296Published

1Opinion of the Court

56 F.3d 70

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Josefa Ernestina CHAIRA, Petitioner,

v.

IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

No. 94-70296.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 2, 1995.*

Decided May 5, 1995.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals, INS No. Afm-sij-otc.

BIA

PETITION GRANTED.

Before: WALLACE, Chief…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Maryam Hartooni v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  3. In Gun Choe v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  4. Hurn Bu Roe v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  5. Pedro Valmores Oloteo and Myrna Isabel Oloteo v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API