Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Lindberg Heat Treating

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided August 9, 2002No. 87,669PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Elliott, J.:

Lindberg Heat Treating (Lindberg) and its workers compensation carrier appeal the Workers Compensation Board’s (Board) finding that claimant Betty J. Palmer suffered a compensable injuiy and work disability.

We affirm.

Palmer’s last day of work for the 1998 Christmas holiday ended on December 23 at 7:30 a.m. When she went to get her paycheck, it had not arrived due to the weather. And even though the plant would be closed, employees were told to either return on December 24 at 11:30 a.m. to get their checks or get the checks on December 27.

Palmer picked up her check on December 24…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Foulk v. Colonial TerraceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1994
  2. Griffin v. Dale Willey Pontiac-Cadillac-GMC Truck, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1999
  3. Chapman v. Beech Aircraft Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  4. Thompson v. Law Offices of Alan JosephSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  5. Cooper v. Mid-America DairymenCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1998

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Smith v. Winfield Livestock Auction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2005
  2. Mendoza v. DCS SANITATIONCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2007
  3. Rash v. HEARTLAND CEMENT CO.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2006
  4. Palmer v. LINDBERG HEAT TREATING AND INS. CO. STATE OF PACourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API