Legal Opinion

Rash v. HEARTLAND CEMENT CO.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided July 14, 2006No. 94,604PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Pierron J.:

Heartland Cement Company (Heartland) and its insurance carrier, Sentry Insurance, appeal the decision of the Workers Compensation Board (Board) awarding Larry Jo Rash workers compensation benefits based on a 65% work disability. Heartland argues the Board erred in not limiting Rash’s benefits to a 16% functional impairment rating because Rash failed to ac cept accommodated employment. Heartland also argues that die Board erred in failing to allow an offset for Rash’s retirement benefits. We find the evidence submitted supports the Board’s findings and affirm.

Rash had worked for…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Foulk v. Colonial TerraceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1994
  2. State Ex Rel. Stovall v. MeneleySupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  3. Copeland v. Johnson Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1997
  4. Nance v. Harvey CountySupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  5. Tovar v. IBP, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Johnson v. Stormont Vail HealthcareCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API