Legal Opinion
Burke v. Maryland Auto Insurance Fund
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 4, 2005No. 03-CV-1445PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TERRY, Associate Judge:
Appellants Tauheed Burke, Dashon Sterling, and Franklin Jeffries filed this action in the Superior Court against appel-lee Maryland Automobile Insurance Fund (“MAIF”), seeking compensation under the uninsured motorist provision of Mr. Burke’s automobile insurance policy for injuries that they suffered in an accident involving an unidentified motorist. At the close of appellants’ case, MAIF moved for a directed verdict pursuant to Super. Ct. Civ. R. 50(a)(1). 1 The court granted the motion and entered judgment in MAIF’s favor. We affirm that judgment.
I
On the evening of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Peoples Drug Stores, Inc. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Corley v. BP Oil Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Allstate Insurance v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- Clement v. Peoples Drug Store, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Abebe v. BenitezDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Evans-Reid v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Wilson v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- Nicola v. Washington Times Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008