Legal Opinion
Fazekas v. University of Houston
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided March 30, 1978No. 17072PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COLEMAN, Chief Justice.
This suit was instituted by Gabriel A. Fazekas for the purpose of recovering salary and retirement benefits denied him by reason of the adoption by the University of Houston of a regulation requiring retirement at age 65. The case was tried to the court and at the conclusion of the evidence, the court sustained special exceptions which he had carried with the case and on the plaintiff’s refusal to amend, entered a judgment dismissing the case and, alternatively, rendered a take nothing judgment against the plaintiff.
The plaintiff asserted causes of action for breach of…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Johnson v. RobisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- McGinnis v. RoysterSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Dodge v. Board of Ed. of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Tooke v. City of MexiaTexas Supreme Court · 2006
- Herbert Darby v. Pasadena Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- Oakley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Bader v. Cox, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1985
- Satterfield & Pontikes Construction, Inc. v. Irving Independent School District, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2004
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.