Legal Opinion

In re Payton

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 6, 1945No. Crim. No. 3889PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

This is an original application for a writ of habeas corpus on the ground that petitioner is being illegally held in custody.

The undisputed facts are these:

Petitioner is a parolee from San Quentin Prison. On *836November 24, 1944, he was placed in the custody of the Sheriff of Los Angeles County at the instance of his parole officer. Thereafter at a meeting of the Adult Authority, held at San Francisco on December 8, 1944, an order* was made suspending petitioner’s parole. Such order did not state the cause upon which the order of suspension was predicated. Petitioner relies for his release upon…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re KnaescheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re EtieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. In Re PaytonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. California Adult Authority v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. In Re CleaverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API