Legal Opinion

Heard v. Holmes

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 28, 1901PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Certiorari. Before Judge Brinson. Richmond superior court. April 28, 1900.

1Opinion of the CourtCobb, J.

1. Under the provisions of section 2801 of the Civil Code, as amended by the act of December 18, 1897 (Acts 1897, p. 30), an employee of a subcontractor is entitled to a lien for work done upon real estate for the amount due him by the subcontractor, provided at the time of the service of the notice upon the true owner such owner is still indebted to the contractor in an amount equal to or greater than the sum due by the subcontractor to his employee; and this is true notwithstanding the fact that at'the time the notice was served the contractor had settled in full with the subcontractor.

2.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fouché & Fouché v. MorrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Borden Brick & Tile Co. v. PulleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  2. General Supply Co. v. HunnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  3. Cambridge Tile Manufacturing Co. v. Germania BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API