Legal Opinion

Brown v. Comm'r

United States Tax Court

Decided February 19, 1968No. 3387-65; No. 1971-66; No. 2209-66UnpublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

M. HUNTER BROWN v. COMMISSIONER

Brown v. Comm'r

No. 3387-65; No. 1971-66; No. 2209-66

United States Tax Court

1968 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 200; 27 T.C.M. (CCH) 127; ax Ct. Mem. Dec. (CCH) 28,849(M);

February 19, 1968, Decided

M. Hunter Brown, Pro se, Santa Monica, Calif.

Erwih L. Stuller and Michael Pargament, for the respondent.

FEATHERSTON, Judge.

FEATHERSTON

Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion

FEATHERSTON, Judge:

Respondent determined the following income tax deficiencies and additions to tax against the petitioner:

Additions to Tax

Sec.

6653(b)

Sec.

Year

Deficiency

n.1 6654(a)

1959

$ 12,851.35

$ 6,425.67

1960

4,82…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Grace M. Powell, of the Estate of O. E. Powell, Deceased v. Ralph C. Granquist, District Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cataldo v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1973
  2. Bothke v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1980
  3. Cataldo v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1973
  4. Rimple v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API