McCorkle v. Penn Mutual Fire Insurance
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
HENDRY, Judge.
This is an appeal from a summary final judgment entered in favor of the defendant, Penn Mutual Fire Insurance Company, in a suit by plaintiffs, Albert W. McCorkle, and his wife, Lily E. McCorkle, on an all-risk insurance policy.
The policy, insuring plaintiffs’ one story, single family dwelling, was in full force and effect in September, 1965, when the roof of the dwelling collapsed due to rain water that had accumulated there during the passage of hurricane Betsy. The policy provided in pertinent part as follows:
“This policy is extended to insure against all risks of direct…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Atlas Assurance Co. Ltd. v. LiesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
- Bringhurst v. O'DonnellCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1924
- McCullough v. HartpenceNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948
- Aetna Insurance Co. v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
- American Insurance v. Guest Printing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- FLORIDA RESID. PROPERTY & CAS. v. KronDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Pauly v. Hartford Insurance Company of the MidwestDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2025
- Zurich American Insurance Company v. Medical Properties Trust, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2024