Legal Opinion

Diksajtsz v. Brosz

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 16, 1931No. Appeal 339PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gawt-hrop, J.,

This is an action of trespass to recover damages for injuries to plaintiff’s property, No. 1117 North Street, Philadelphia, alleged to have been caused by an excavation made by defendant, appellant, on a plot of ground belonging to the Board of Education of the City of Philadelphia, which adjoined plaintiff’s lot along the rear end thereof. Plaintiff’s brick house, and a brick toilet annexed thereto, occupy substantially the whole of his lot, the rear end of the toilet abutting the land belonging to the Board of Education. A small portion of the lot on the rear end…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Rabe v. Shoenberger Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  2. Durante v. AlbaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. McGettigan v. PottsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  4. Cunningham v. Fort Pitt Bridge WorksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  5. Matulys v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Leebov v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Art Club v. Heyman and GoodmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Lugin v. DobsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API