Legal Opinion

Art Club v. Heyman and Goodman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 19, 1937No. Appeal, 256PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Deew,

This action of trespass was instituted by the Art Club of Philadelphia, a corporation, to recover compensation for damages allegedly sustained by it as a result of defendant’s negligence. By agreement the case was tried below without a jury. The court found for plaintiff in the sum of $9,111 which was computed as follows: $4,-515 for the cost of repairs, $2,500 for depreciation in the value of the building, and $2,096 for delay in payment. After its exceptions to the findings of fact and conclusions of law were overruled and judgment entered, defendant appealed.

The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rabe v. Shoenberger Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  2. Vanderslice v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1883
  3. Wallace v. MoyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Diksajtsz v. BroszSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lobozzo v. Adam Eidemiller, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. Speed v. Transamerica CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1955
  3. Duquesne Light Co. v. Woodland Hills School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Wade v. S. J. Groves & Sons Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Hartford National Bank & Trust Co. v. E. F. Drew & Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1960

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API