Legal Opinion

Smith v. Real Estate Agency

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 7, 1997No. 693-R-252P; CA A93028PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOSEPH, S. J.

Petitioners separately seek review of an order by the Real Estate Commissioner pursuant to ORS 696.990(4) and (5) imposing penalties on them for engaging in professional real estate activities without a license. The issues raised by each petitioner are different and will be considered separately.

ORS 696.020(1) provides:

“No person shall engage in, carry on, advertise or purport to engage in or carry on professional real estate activity, or act in the capacity of, a real estate licensee within this state without first obtaining a license as provided for in this chapter.”

“Professiona…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of Roseburg v. Roseburg City Firefighters, Local No. 1489Oregon Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Labor Ready Northwest, Inc. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  2. Kerley v. Real Estate AgencyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API