Legal Opinion

People v. Salas

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 2, 1975No. Crim. 2118PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GINSBURG, J. *

Appelant was found guilty of a violation of Health and Safety Code section 11352, possession of heroin for sale. The jury also found that appellant had a prior felony conviction, possession of marijuana. He appeals from the whole of this judgment.

One Edward Faias, a narcotic user, approached appellant in a tavern and asked to purchase some heroin. Faias was a police informer who had been skin-searched by police officers, wired with a concealed portable transmitter designed to broadcast to a tape recorder, provided with $10, and sent forth for the specific purpose of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. People v. RedmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. People v. ReillyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. In Re FossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. MauryCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. People v. BurgenerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  3. People v. WolcottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. People v. NakaharaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  5. People v. GallowayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API